---
title: "Is Liubo an Ancestor of Xiangqi? What the Evidence Shows · Xiangqi Master"
description: "Liubo is a much older Chinese board game, largely lost by the time xiangqi took shape, and no clear line of descent connects the two despite both being ancient and Chinese."
url: https://xiangqimaster.com/blog/is-liubo-an-ancestor-of-xiangqi
updated: 2026-09-23
source: Xiangqi Master (https://xiangqimaster.com)
license: CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
---

# Is liubo (六博), the ancient Chinese board game, an ancestor of xiangqi?

These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws and is regression-tested against the official 110-diagram repetition casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it against the engine before publishing.

> Direct answer
>
> **Not directly, as far as the evidence shows.** Liubo (六博) is a genuinely ancient Chinese board and dice game, documented many centuries before xiangqi's Song-dynasty form, but its exact rules fell out of use and were largely lost well before xiangqi existed. The two are both old and both Chinese, which is most of why they get connected, not a documented line of descent.

## What is actually known about liubo

Liubo appears in early Chinese texts and archaeological finds, played with counters and throwing sticks or dice on a marked board, and it was clearly popular for a long stretch of early Chinese history. But because its precise rules were never fully preserved, and because it faded from use well before the Song dynasty, historians cannot trace a clear mechanical link from liubo's play to xiangqi's.

## Why the confusion is understandable anyway

Both are old, both are Chinese, and both eventually gave way to newer games, which makes them easy to lump together as "ancient Chinese board games" in casual accounts. Xiangqi's own documented ancestry runs through a different, better-evidenced family shared with chess and its Indian relatives, not through liubo. See [how xiangqi is related to chess](https://xiangqimaster.com/blog/is-xiangqi-related-to-chess) for that actual lineage.

## Related questions

Is liubo still played today?

Not in its original form. Its exact rules were lost, and modern attempts to reconstruct it are scholarly exercises rather than a living tradition.

Are there other lost Chinese games sometimes confused with xiangqi?

Yes, several early games are known mostly by name from historical texts, without enough detail surviving to compare them meaningfully to xiangqi.

## Related xiangqi resources

History of xiangqi

When the game was invented, and what is actually documented

Xiangqi vs chess

What carries over from western chess, and what does not

Xiangqi questions answered

Every question on this site, in one index

## Try it on a real board

Reading an answer is one thing; playing it is another. Free, instant, and nothing to install.