Can a cannon help defend against a horse fork?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws and is regression-tested against the official 110-diagram repetition casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it against the engine before publishing.
Direct answer
Sometimes. A cannon cannot stop a fork from landing the way a piece controlling the fork square could, but once the fork exists it can threaten the horse itself across a screen, forcing it to choose between completing the fork and saving itself. If the horse has nowhere safe to retreat to afterward, a well-placed cannon can make the whole fork unprofitable.
Why this only sometimes works
It depends entirely on whether a screen already exists, or can be created in time, on a line to the horse's square. A cannon with no usable line to the forking square contributes nothing to the defence, which is why this is a situational resource rather than a general answer to horse forks.
The more reliable defence
Preventing the fork square from being reachable in the first place, watching horse legs and controlling the squares a horse wants to jump to, works far more often than trying to punish a fork after it has already landed. Treat a cannon's counter-threat as a bonus resource, not the primary plan.
Related questions
Is this a common tactic at club level?
Not especially common, mainly because it needs a screen already in place at exactly the right moment.
What is the more general defence against a horse fork?
Controlling the horse's leg points before it reaches the fork square. See the horse fork for the fuller picture.
.