Can I learn xiangqi just by watching videos or games, without actually playing?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws and is regression-tested against the official 110-diagram repetition casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it against the engine before publishing.
Direct answer
Only partly. Watching games or explanatory videos is a genuinely fine way to absorb the rules and get a first sense of how pieces cooperate, but the habits that actually stop you losing pieces, checking a cannon's screen, watching a horse's leg, come from making moves yourself and being punished when you get them wrong. Passive viewing alone does not build that.
What watching alone does teach
The rules themselves, roughly what a reasonable opening looks like, and some visual familiarity with common patterns transfer reasonably well from watching, especially for a total newcomer deciding whether the game even appeals to them. It is a legitimate and easy way in.
Why it stops working past that point
Recognising a cannon threat you are shown is a much easier task than noticing one yourself under time pressure in your own game, and only the second version is the actual skill that prevents losses. Play, even losing badly and often against the computer, builds that skill in a way watching simply cannot substitute for.
Related questions
So should I watch first, then play, or the other way around?
Either order works; some people prefer watching a little first to get comfortable, others prefer diving straight into games and looking things up as needed.
Is it worth watching games once I am already playing regularly?
Yes, it becomes more useful at that point, since you can compare a strong player's decisions against your own developing instincts.
.