Is it fine to only ever play xiangqi casually and never try to compete?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws for movement, checkmate and both repetition rulings: a side that forces a repetition by perpetual check or perpetual chase loses rather than drawing. The chase half has not been validated against the official casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it before publishing.
Direct answer
Completely fine, and it describes most players everywhere. Park and club culture worldwide is built around exactly this kind of play, games for their own sake, with no rating on the line and no ambition beyond a good game. There is no version of xiangqi where casual play is the lesser or incomplete way to enjoy it.
Why competitive framing can crowd this out online
Rated matchmaking, leaderboards and improvement guides are naturally visible on any site built around play, which can make it feel like the "real" goal is always to climb a rating. That is simply not true; a huge amount of the game's actual daily play, especially in parks and clubs, has never involved a rating at all.
What casual-only play still gives you
Everything that makes the game enjoyable, the tactics, the patterns, the satisfaction of a well-executed plan, is present in a purely casual game exactly as it is in a rated one. Nothing about improvement or study is required to keep playing happily for years.
Related questions
Do I need an account to just play casually?
Not to play the computer. Playing other people needs an account with a confirmed email address, but casual games can be kept entirely unrated. See do I need an account to play xiangqi.
Will I still get better even if I never study formally?
Slowly, from repetition alone, though study speeds it up considerably if and when you ever want that.
.