Is it useful to specifically study my losses against the same recurring opponent?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws and is regression-tested against the official 110-diagram repetition casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it against the engine before publishing.
Direct answer
Yes, genuinely useful, and in a way a broad mix of one-off opponents cannot match. A specific, recurring opponent's habits, favourite systems, typical weaknesses, how they handle certain kinds of positions, only become visible across several games against them specifically, and that pattern is exactly what targeted preparation for your next meeting can be built around.
Why this differs from general game review
Reviewing games against many different opponents mostly teaches you about your own play in general. Reviewing several games against one recurring opponent teaches you about them specifically, what they tend to miss, what openings they default to, which kinds of positions they handle less comfortably, information a single game or a mixed set cannot reveal nearly as clearly.
How to actually use what you find
Look for a genuine repeated pattern across multiple games against them rather than reading too much into one result, then prepare specifically for it the way described at preparing an opening against a known opponent. This works for club rivals and regular online opponents alike.
Related questions
Is this only useful for opponents I play often, like a club rival?
Mainly yes, since the pattern only becomes visible with enough games against the same person; a single past game is not really enough to build on.
Does this feel unsporting to my opponent?
Not really, they can do the same with your games; studying a known opponent is standard practice in any competitive setting.
.