Should I memorise xiangqi opening lines?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws for movement, checkmate and both repetition rulings: a side that forces a repetition by perpetual check or perpetual chase loses rather than drawing. The chase half has not been validated against the official casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it before publishing.
Direct answer
No. Learn the first four or five moves and the idea behind them, then play and look at where things went wrong. Your opponents leave theory early, so the moves you actually need are the ones they played — and no book knows what those are.
What to do instead
When a game goes badly out of the opening, find the move that gave the position away and work out what the idea behind the correct move was. One position understood is worth twenty lines memorised, because the understanding transfers and the line does not.
The trap of switching systems
Losing a game rarely means the opening was wrong. Changing systems after every loss resets the understanding you were building and hides the real problem, which is usually a tactic in the middlegame.
Related questions
How deep do masters know openings?
Very deep, because they face opponents who also know them. That is a different problem from yours.
Is opening study ever worth it?
Once you stop losing to tactics. Until then, tactics have a far higher return per hour.
.