Was xiangqi one of the traditional four arts of the Chinese scholar?
These answers restate the rules implemented by our open-source engine, which follows the WXF laws and is regression-tested against the official 110-diagram repetition casebook. Where an answer refers to a specific position, that position lives on the linked reference page, where the build verifies it against the engine before publishing.
Direct answer
No, that place belongs to go. The traditional "four arts" of the Chinese scholar-gentleman, 琴棋書畫 (zither, board games, calligraphy, painting), used 棋 to mean go (圍棋) specifically, the game long associated with the literati. Xiangqi occupied a different, more broadly popular cultural niche.
Why go got the elite slot
Go's association with scholarly and gentry culture is old and well documented, tied to the abstraction, territory and long-range planning that suited how the literati liked to present the game intellectually. Xiangqi, with its concrete armies, capture-based fighting and much lower barrier to learning, was played across a far wider social range, from court to street, without carrying the same status marker.
What this meant in practice
Go manuals and go culture attracted formal scholarly writing earlier, while xiangqi's literature, though real and substantial by the Ming and Qing dynasties, developed alongside a much larger base of ordinary players rather than primarily an educated elite. That popular reach is arguably a large part of why xiangqi ended up with the far larger player base it has today.
Related questions
Does this mean xiangqi was looked down on?
Not exactly. It simply was not part of the specific elite curriculum the four arts describe, and it remained hugely popular in its own right.
Is this the same reason go is older?
Related but distinct. Go's greater age and its association with the four arts are separate facts that happen to point the same way.
.